HomeCemeteriesFirst Landing State Park and the Last Trace of a Vanquished Nation

Comments

First Landing State Park and the Last Trace of a Vanquished Nation — 10 Comments

  1. Pingback:Hidden Treasure at First Landing State Park - Neptune Ghosts

  2. A couple of comments and a question – I worked at Seashore/First Landing as a Seasonal Ranger for several years in the 1950’s and was much involved there until the beginning of the 1960’s. There was then a long sandbar at the 64th Street Narrows which was covered in places with small pieces of Native American pottery. I first thought they were outcroppings of clay, until “Mac” McNeil, the Chief Ranger, later Superintendent, pointed out the grass imprints on the outer sides from the pottery drying or baking process. Mac had a perfect condition fairly large pale gray stone spear (?) head he had found in the Park. QUESTION – Just this week heard from a local historian of sorts that the preparation of the site for the Jamestown Exposition (now the Norfolk Naval Station) uncovered a Native American burial ground of a hundred or so skeletons plus artifacts; that the artifacts were carried away by the workers, etc. and the bones scattered. Any truth to this story?

  3. Much respect for our Native ancestors. They were here 1st. I was married to a full blood collville native out of washington state. Loved the culture so nothing but respect. Native remains should not be put on display and should recieve a proper burial by native americans only.

  4. Thanks very much for your quick and detailed reply. I’ll certainly take Helen Rountree’s word for it, and while her reading of Stratchey isn’t the most optimistic, it does make a certain grim sense.

    As for the gravesite itself, I’ve noticed quite a few items left over the seasons–pebbles, coins, shells, small things on the tops of posts. Do you have any idea who’s leaving these items?

    • Although I’m not Native, I’ve spoken with local Indians in my reporting on them through the years, and the gravesite has come up in conversation on occasion. I gather that many locals who are members of an established Virginia tribe or are in some way related have made trips to see this. They consider it a sacred site. There’s no way to tell, of course, but I imagine some of the shells and coins have been left by them. Other folks who take the time to read the plaque and consider the significance of that site, I hope, are similarly moved. What’s remarkable, I think, is that shells are among the items left on the fenceposts around the gravesite, presumably because that’s what’s there on the ground in the terrain of the park. As it turns out, though, that’s an appropriate tribute to the deceased, as shells were an important cultural item. One of the Indians who was exhumed from the Great Neck site was evidently a chief and buried with thousands of shells.

  5. I’ve seen the gravesite many times, and it’s quietly moving.

    What are your sources for the story of Powhatan’s prophecy and his response? And in particular, what evidence is there that the women and children of the Chesapeake Indians weren’t simply absorbed into the surrounding populations, as often happened?

    • John,

      Thanks for reading and for your comment. Yes, the burial is moving. There’s another one like it with with re-interred remains of Paspahegh Indians at Governor’s Land nearby where I live in Williamsburg.

      As to the reference on the prophecy and extermination, I relied on scholars Helen Rountree and Jim Horn for that. Rountree mentions it in The Powhatan Indians of Virginia (p. 120-121) and in Pocahontas, Powhatan, Opechancanough (p. 45). Horn mentions it in A Land as God Made It on p. 13. Both of them rely on William Stratchey’s accounts as well as their extensive knowledge of Indian-English relations of the era.

      Rountree in The Powhatan Indians of Virginia specifically addresses the common practice of bringing the women and children of vanquished foes into the conquering tribe, but she claims that because Stratchey’s description reads that “all the Inhabitants, the weroance and his Subiects” were killed, that rule was likely broken and the women and children were among those murdered.

      But like you suggest, it’s really hard so many years later without sufficient primary documentation to complete a definitive description of what occurred.

      Thanks again for reading.

      Ben

  6. Pingback:VB Commission Invites Public to Explore Preserving the History of Cape Henry | AMERICAN CORPS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATORS

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>